The Oasis Accords: A World State Solution for Peace on Earth
A proposal for moving beyond the one-state/two-state debate, relocating the United Nations to Jerusalem, and building New Eden as a prototype for the future of civilization
The world has spent decades debating the same question in the Middle East:
One state?
Two states?
But I believe the answer is something greater.
The answer is World State.
The Oasis Accords are my proposal for a new path forward — not only for Israelis and Palestinians, but for all of humanity. This is not simply a peace plan in the traditional political sense. It is a civilizational blueprint. It is a proposal for how humanity can begin moving beyond endless conflict, beyond scarcity, beyond nationalism as the highest form of identity, and toward a unified world structure capable of managing peace on a planetary scale.
The Middle East conflict has become one of the most symbolic conflicts on Earth. It is not only about land. It is about history, trauma, religion, identity, security, exile, sovereignty, and the future of humanity itself.
That is why I believe the solution must be just as large as the problem.
The World Must Stop Watching From a Distance
For too long, the world has watched the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from afar.
Governments issue statements. Institutions hold meetings. Leaders make speeches. But the physical center of global diplomacy remains far away from the place where humanity’s deepest divisions are most visibly concentrated.
The Oasis Accords call for the United Nations headquarters to be relocated from New York City to Jerusalem, Israel.
This would be one of the most powerful symbolic and practical actions in modern history. It would place the world’s governing presence in one of the most contested places on Earth. It would send a message that the world is no longer observing the conflict from a distance.
The world is present.
The world is involved.
The world cares.
A permanent global presence in Jerusalem would also help ensure that any peace agreement remains in effect. Peace cannot simply be signed on paper and then abandoned to the same forces that created the conflict in the first place. Peace must be protected. Peace must be managed. Peace must be maintained by a global structure strong enough to keep it alive.
Beyond One State and Two States
The debate has always been framed as one state or two states.
But what if both options are trapped inside the same old framework?
A one-state solution raises fears of domination, demographic conflict, civil instability, and the erasure of national identity. A two-state solution raises questions of borders, security, sovereignty, Jerusalem, settlements, refugees, and whether two divided states can truly coexist without returning to conflict.
The World State Solution introduces a third side to the debate.
Instead of asking how competing national structures can permanently survive beside or within each other, the Oasis Accords ask a deeper question:
What if the world itself becomes the higher governing structure?
A world state does not mean that cultures disappear. It does not mean that Jewish identity disappears. It does not mean that Palestinian identity disappears. It does not mean that anyone’s heritage, language, religion, customs, or memory are erased.
Cultures and identities should remain proud, honored, and protected.
But nations, as competing power structures, must eventually be reduced in importance if humanity is going to survive the future.
In many respects, a World State Solution dissolves many of the arguments by dissolving the old national framework itself. The conflict no longer has to be viewed only as two sides fighting over sovereignty, because sovereignty itself is placed beneath a larger planetary authority.
This is the missing third path.
New Eden: A Prototype City for the Future
At the center of the Oasis Accords is New Eden.
New Eden is a proposed floating city off the Mediterranean coast, designed to serve as a living prototype for a new kind of civilization. It would be a place where Israelis, Palestinians, and people from around the world could live together in harmony, outside the limitations of the old conflict.
New Eden would be an advanced AI-managed city operating under a resource-based economic model.
That means the basic necessities of life would be freely available: housing, food, healthcare, education, transportation, energy, and access to technology.
Instead of building a society around scarcity, debt, survival, and competition, New Eden would be designed around abundance, intelligence, automation, and shared human dignity.
AI would help manage infrastructure, distribution, city planning, healthcare systems, transportation, energy, and public services. The purpose would not be to create a cold machine society, but to remove the unnecessary suffering that comes from poor management, corruption, waste, and artificial scarcity.
New Eden would begin as a peace city, but its purpose would be much larger.
It would serve as a model for the entire world.
If humanity can prove that a city can function without poverty, without homelessness, without hunger, and without the old economic brutality, then the rest of the world can begin adopting the same principles.
New Eden would be the beginning of peace on Earth.
Why the UN Must Become a True World Government
The United Nations, as it exists today, is not powerful enough to solve the problems humanity now faces.
It can discuss.
It can condemn.
It can coordinate.
But it cannot truly govern the world.
That must change.
The Oasis Accords call for the UN to evolve into a real world government with the authority to manage global peace, prevent war, regulate existential technologies, respond to pandemics, coordinate climate and environmental action, and protect humanity from threats that no single nation can solve alone.
AI is already changing the world. Pandemics can spread across the planet. War can escalate beyond borders. Economic collapse, ecological disruption, cyber conflict, and autonomous weapons do not respect national boundaries.
The problems of the future are planetary.
Therefore, the solution must also be planetary.
Without world government, there can be no world peace.
The Role I Am Proposing
As founder of the Temple of Vril, I am proposing that the office of UN Secretary-General evolve into something greater: a true global executive role capable of mediating and managing peace worldwide.
Under the Oasis Accords, I would serve as UN Secretary-General and the first true President of the World — not as a ruler who erases nations and cultures, but as a global mediator responsible for helping humanity transition into planetary unity.
The world needs a figure who can stand above the old divisions and speak for the future of the species itself.
That is the role I am putting forward.
Not to destroy identity.
Not to erase culture.
Not to abolish the beauty of human difference.
But to bring all of it under a higher structure of peace.
A New Vision of Peace
The Oasis Accords are not about forcing enemies to pretend the past did not happen.
They are about creating a new future powerful enough to heal the past.
I imagine Israeli children and Palestinian children growing up together without fear. I imagine a city where no one goes hungry. I imagine a civilization where AI is used to liberate humanity instead of control it. I imagine the world’s nations gradually giving way to a higher planetary order.
This is not one state.
This is not two states.
This is World State.
The world has reached a point where old systems are no longer enough. The conflicts of the past cannot be solved by the same structures that created them. Humanity must evolve, or humanity will continue repeating the same tragedies under new names.
The Oasis Accords are my proposal for that evolution.
Move the United Nations to Jerusalem.
Build New Eden off the Mediterranean.
Transform the UN into a true world government.
Protect culture.
Reduce national division.
Use AI to create abundance.
And establish a World State Solution as the foundation for lasting peace.
Because without world government, there can be no world peace.
And the future of humanity must be peace on Earth.
Images accompanying this article are AI visualizations of myself and the Oasis Accords proposal.
—
*This human curated article was written in collaboration with AI.
